stomping a motherfucker into paste
Mar. 29th, 2025 03:02 pmStories have power. Stories reflect and shape, both. We are creatures of story, and they're worth our reflection.
I've especially enjoyed a story told as an animated show intended for young audiences. One which corporate decided "didn't fit that brand" (*cough* queer *cough*) and cut, but which pulled out a satisfying ending nevertheless. In its first episode our main character frees people imprisoned in the "Conformatorium" for being weirdos. It's delightful from jump, is what I'm saying.
The show's final confrontation with the villain involves the heroes working alongside a young supernatural creature, an immaturely amoral former antagonist. He has just been given his first lessons in Bridging Differences with Kindness and Compassion and Treating Other People Like People Not Objects. He is SO EXCITED to use this new skill on the villain. He fails to notice his new friends' horror at the misguided attempt.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyvCaiVczSc&ab_channel=drybones592
"Does that make us as bad as [the villain]?"
She is terrified that by using or even just wishing for violence, that she is no different than the man who destroyed her world and hurt her friends.
Thankfully she is talking to someone infinitely older and wiser, who assures her:
"You assume [the villain's] goal comes from a genuine place. But that man doesn't care about anything but his need to be the hero in his own delusion, and because of that, he fears what he can't control."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RuDPoPu3Bk&ab_channel=Marbles
When the team finally does defeat the villain, he shrinks back to his previous form, a lost young man in need of help. He is supplicating. "Oh thank goodness you saved me from that horrible curse."
The lead is unimpressed. The lie is revealed. He reverts to his monstrous form.
"You'll be just as bad [if you don't help me]. Just as conniving. Just as evil, just as unforgivable [...] You're better than this."
The lead steps back and her friends step forward: "Well we ain't."
And they stomp the motherfucker into paste.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmgFa4vH5gI&ab_channel=Rantic
I talk about story with my child. We've had conversations highlighting the contrast between letting Wormtongue go and the ruin it brings, and stomping a motherfucker into paste. These conversations have been largely filled with indignant laughter but will sharpen as he gets older. As the world itself becomes sharper, and this weighing of choices becomes progressively less abstract.
I'm thinking of the shock in my early 20's of seeing a character I adored watch the show's hero stride off after sparing the guy she just spent the season finale defeating, whose body hosts an evil villain and who was complicit in her crimes... This beloved character, all charm and softness to his young friends, leans down and quietly suffocates the vanquished foe. To spare future victims and to spare the protagonist the moral injury of the murder. He was already morally compromised. It was no real sacrifice for him. A gift to his beloved young charge, who could keep on being the hero.
It felt new to see on my little screen. I certainly took note.
That was twenty years ago. Now... the main crew of my child's favorite show- a Disney cartoon albeit one the mouse cast out- stomped the motherfucker into paste.
They don't have time for anyone to wrestle further with this decision on screen, with about five minutes left to wrap up the whole canceled show. Maybe it's only two data points, but they make an interesting line regardless.
The moral high ground is a lie. The only real question is, what then do we do?
I've especially enjoyed a story told as an animated show intended for young audiences. One which corporate decided "didn't fit that brand" (*cough* queer *cough*) and cut, but which pulled out a satisfying ending nevertheless. In its first episode our main character frees people imprisoned in the "Conformatorium" for being weirdos. It's delightful from jump, is what I'm saying.
The show's final confrontation with the villain involves the heroes working alongside a young supernatural creature, an immaturely amoral former antagonist. He has just been given his first lessons in Bridging Differences with Kindness and Compassion and Treating Other People Like People Not Objects. He is SO EXCITED to use this new skill on the villain. He fails to notice his new friends' horror at the misguided attempt.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyvCaiVczSc&ab_channel=drybones592
It doesn't work. Because of course it doesn't work. Because it's not a universal problem solver. It doesn't defeat actual evil but enables it. And his attempt results in his first understanding of what death is.
The main character (in a life and death limbo) admits that she'd hoped the alien child would have instead "blast[ed] him away." The person she confesses this to replies they had not just wished for but committed an act of violence to protect their kid. Our young main turns to them and asks:
The main character (in a life and death limbo) admits that she'd hoped the alien child would have instead "blast[ed] him away." The person she confesses this to replies they had not just wished for but committed an act of violence to protect their kid. Our young main turns to them and asks:
"Does that make us as bad as [the villain]?"
She is terrified that by using or even just wishing for violence, that she is no different than the man who destroyed her world and hurt her friends.
Thankfully she is talking to someone infinitely older and wiser, who assures her:
"You assume [the villain's] goal comes from a genuine place. But that man doesn't care about anything but his need to be the hero in his own delusion, and because of that, he fears what he can't control."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RuDPoPu3Bk&ab_channel=Marbles
When the team finally does defeat the villain, he shrinks back to his previous form, a lost young man in need of help. He is supplicating. "Oh thank goodness you saved me from that horrible curse."
The lead is unimpressed. The lie is revealed. He reverts to his monstrous form.
"You'll be just as bad [if you don't help me]. Just as conniving. Just as evil, just as unforgivable [...] You're better than this."
The lead steps back and her friends step forward: "Well we ain't."
And they stomp the motherfucker into paste.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmgFa4vH5gI&ab_channel=Rantic
I talk about story with my child. We've had conversations highlighting the contrast between letting Wormtongue go and the ruin it brings, and stomping a motherfucker into paste. These conversations have been largely filled with indignant laughter but will sharpen as he gets older. As the world itself becomes sharper, and this weighing of choices becomes progressively less abstract.
I'm thinking of the shock in my early 20's of seeing a character I adored watch the show's hero stride off after sparing the guy she just spent the season finale defeating, whose body hosts an evil villain and who was complicit in her crimes... This beloved character, all charm and softness to his young friends, leans down and quietly suffocates the vanquished foe. To spare future victims and to spare the protagonist the moral injury of the murder. He was already morally compromised. It was no real sacrifice for him. A gift to his beloved young charge, who could keep on being the hero.
It felt new to see on my little screen. I certainly took note.
That was twenty years ago. Now... the main crew of my child's favorite show- a Disney cartoon albeit one the mouse cast out- stomped the motherfucker into paste.
They don't have time for anyone to wrestle further with this decision on screen, with about five minutes left to wrap up the whole canceled show. Maybe it's only two data points, but they make an interesting line regardless.
The moral high ground is a lie. The only real question is, what then do we do?